Older People Adopting the GreyPath Village Lyceum: an Analysis Informed by Innovation Diffusion

Jerzy K.Lepa , Lecturer, Victoria University , PO Box 14428, Melbourne City, MC 8001 , Victoria, Jerzy.Lepa@vu.edu.au

Arthur.Tatnall, Senior Lecturer, Victoria University , PO Box 14428, Melbourne City, MC 8001, Victoria, ArthurTatnall@vu.edu.au

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to set out a research approach to the investigation of how the older people of Australia are being enticed, encouraged and stimulated to take up an innovative new Internet technology: the GreyPathVillage. There must be many reasons, attractions and vehicles involved in any discussion of why older people adopt Internet technology. Alreadya significant proportion of older people are using the Internet, however this is not in the same proportions as for younger groups. One recently developed approach to attract older persons to the Internet, is that of the Grey Path Village Lyceum, a virtual community and chat facility forolder people, accessible through the GreyPath portal (http://www.greypath.com.au/).This paper will use a diffusion of innovations framework to outline a research approach to investigating the nature of this innovation and its adoptionby older Australians.

Introduction


The proportion of older people will increase dramatically over the next 25 years. There are several different definitions of what constitutes an ‘older person’ but for the purposes of this paper we will define olderpeople as those of fifty-five years of age and over, regardless of whether they are still in the full-time workforce. Globally the importance of older people is demonstrated by their large numbers: in 1999 world statistics showed 578 million people over the age of 60 (Scott 1999). Between 1946 and 1998 the proportion of people over 65 in Australia increased from 8% to 12% (to 2.3 million people). By 2025 this figure will be 17.2% (around 4 million) and by 2051 this proportion will increase to 24% (6 million)(Scott 1999).

The Internet, a communication and informational access technology, has the potential to improve the older person’s lifestyle (Fozard 2000). The Australian Federal Government has demonstrated a commitment to older Australians by releasing a number of issues papers which “impact on older people’s capacity to remain active and independent” (Bishop 2000). A key feature of these papers is an emphasis on communication, in particular through the Internet which enables older people to communicate via e-mail with family and friends, to access information and to purchase goods. This emphasis is also consistent with literature sourced from overseas (Franklin 1997;Coulson 2000). The use of e-mail can also reduce social isolation for thoseolder people with reduced mobility or living in remote or rural areas (Parekh1998, Bishop 2000).

This paper sets out a research approach to investigating how older people adopt, or fail to adopt Web sites such as the GreyPath Village portal.Our research is on-going, and this paper does not set out to demonstrate that this Web site attracts large numbers of older people at this time– further research will be necessary to establish this. What the paper does do is to set out the diffusion of innovations framework in which this on-going research is being conducted. We have chosen a framework of this type rather than one involving another approach such as innovation translation (Tatnall and Lepa 2001) as we are investigating overall issues in technology adoption rather than how particular individuals relate to this technology.
 

Web Portals and GreyPath

A portal, as defined by Rao (2001) means gateway, and in terms of WWW sites a portal is  seen as a major starting point for users when they access the Web, or one that users tend to visit as a base-site that provides links to multiple Web sites offering the content they require. Many portals operate y transforming the content from third party providers into suitable packages for their target audience with the intention of making revenue through advertising. The portals do not necessarily have to develop their own content.The creators of portals aim to provide a comprehensive service so as to rapidly encourage visitors to regard the portal as a permanent ‘parking space’ on the Internet. “No matter what the goals, the key to a successful portal is to offer an oasis of organization within the ‘tangled’ Web” (Rao2001). When accessing the Internet, the portal should be the first site that customers visit and return to each day.  When accessing the Internet, the portal should be the first site that customers visit and return to each day.

Historically, Lynch (1998) suggests, portals developed out of search engine sites such as Yahoo!, Excite, and Lycos which can now be classified as first-generation portals. These sites, however, quickly evolved intosites providing additional services such as e-mail, stock quotes, news,and community building rather than just search capabilities (Rao 2001).
 

The GreyPath Portal

Portals may be of horizontal or vertical nature (Lynch 1998). Sites such as Yahoo!, Excite and NetCenter can be considered as horizontal portals because they are used by a broad base of users. Vertical portals, however, have “a tightly focused content area geared toward a particular audience”(Lynch 1998). As GreyPath has content geared to the older people of Australia it may, using Lynch’s definition (1998), be classified as a vertical portal.

The concept of the GreyPath portal was created by Ray Lewis, a 66 year older senior. Lewis commenced his working life in 1966 as a RAAF officer and since then has held many top ranking executive positions such as Director and Chairman in Australian companies. Currently, as chairman, he heads Edion Pty Ltd, a computer software solutions company. At the age of 65 he felt that he could make a contribution to society by looking after his own demographic: the community of older people. He perceived a need for an Internet portal dedicated to Australian seniors. As a consequence he has developed and manages the GreyPath portal (Lewis 2002).

Lewis describes GreyPath as follows: “GreyPath is a uniquely styled, demographically ‘inclusive’, user friendly, seniors web portal and virtual community, that has been designed first and foremost to empower seniors and enrich the quality of their lives. It has an ability to encourage site loyalty, identification with, and participation, from its constituency”(Lewis 2002). However as the developmental and on-going maintenance costs for GreyPath have been considerable, Lewis’s ultimate aim, along with providing a service to seniors, is to make GreyPath a successful commercial venture.

GreyPath has three major components: firstly, there are links which are informational, or categories that pertain to the ‘mind’ (Lewis 2002). These include finance, legal, health, education, services, travel, artand culture, and entertainment. The second group are more everyday needs type categories which Lewis describes as pertaining to the ‘heart’ such as relationships, news and the weather. The third major component of the portal is the Village, an innovative virtual community where older people can chat and communicate with each other anonymously about common interests.

Lewis (2002) suggests that the Village is a “world’s first with a carefully specified and atmospherically crafted Virtual 3D community for seniors. It’s clearly more attractive to chat in, for example, than any other site anywhere in the world, despite many being far more sophisticated. Its advantage is simplicity (user friendliness), naturalized visual environment, and clear potential for further development”.
 

Virtual Communities and the Internet

A virtual community is a group of people who share a common interest or bond. Rather than meeting physically they “form communities that cross geographical, social, cultural and economic boundaries” (Matathia 1998:156) and communicate via the Internet (Matathia 1998; Schneider 2000 :10). Some examples of virtual communities, using computer and modem, are the group of older people who share a common life stage, music lovers with an affection for a particular genre, and teenagers battling through ‘thetrials and tribulations of adolescence’ (Matathia 1998 :156).

There are a number of alternative names for virtual communities such as ‘communities of interest’  (Hagel and Armstrong 1997) and ‘Internet cultures’  (Jones 1995).  From an on-line  marketing perspective Muniz (1997) calls them ‘brand communities’ and Kozinets (1998) uses theterm  ‘virtual communities of consumption’.

Barnatt (1998) suggests that there are two categories of virtual community:off-line and on-line. Both categories of virtual community share common interests and bonds but on-line, Internet-based virtual communities today “allow a wide range of global individuals to argue, share information, make friends, and undertake economic exchanges, in a flexible and socially-compelling common on-line arena”. In contrast, members of an off-line virtual community do not communicate directly with one another but are reliant on ‘broadcast’ mediums such as newspapers, TV and radio to sustain their common interests or bonds.

As the group of Australian older people, who use the GreyPath Village site chat facilities,  share a common bond of ageing, they can be considered to form an on-line virtual community.  These on-line relationships “can be every bit as strong and permanent as their ‘real world’ counterparts ”Matathia (1998 :156).  Individuals in this group, prior to accessing the Internet, would have been classified as part of the off-line communityof older Australian people.

Have these older people, who are now accessing the GreyPath Village,adopted an innovation? Rogers (1995 :11) defines an innovation as an “idea, practice, or object that is perceived as new by an individual or other unit of adoption.”  To be considered or classified as an innovation, theidea can either be objectively new to all humanity in chronological terms or it can simply be new to the individual concerned. As GreyPath Villagecan be considered chronologically new to all humanity (Lewis 2002) then the older people who access this virtual community facility can be considered to be adopting an innovation.

The GreyPath portal, a dedicated older person Web site, provides informational links, entertainment-type links and also a link to the GreyPath Village Lyceum where older person visitors use the chat facilities to form a virtual community.

The Village at GreyPath, through its Internet chat rooms, creates a virtual community of older people. The Village has seven chat rooms (see Fig 1): Town Hall, Megs Café, Murphy’s Pub, the Public Library,St. Isadores, The Lyceum and The Village Health Centre. In this paper the authors will concentrate on the innovative Lyceum section of the Village.This Village has been conceived and designed with engaging interactive activities which will firstly attract older people to the GreyPath portal and then help to instil and promote confidence and familiarity as well as alleviate feelings of insecurity or computer phobia in Internet usage (Lewis 2002).

Figure 1 The GreyPath Village

What is the Village Lyceum?

The Lyceum is a virtual building in the Village devoted to the study and discussion of art.  Visitors to the Village Lyceum, using the chat facilities, can  share their common art interests. Just a single click allows the visitor entry to the Lyceum building and participate in a chat session. In addition to chatting, visitors to the Village Lyceum have the opportunity to enjoy a “free art appreciation course, covering post 1945 Australian ‘icon’ artists” (GreyPath Village Bulletin Board 2002). ‘Lookart’, a virtual gallery, together with GreyPath, will be showcasing the works of a series of famous Australian artists over the next 12 months, focussing on a new artist every two weeks. The current artist being reviewed is Howard Arkley and the site includes recent information on his career development and exhibitions. Visitors are encouraged to return to the site via GreyPath with the promise of being able to explore the works of many other Australian artists such as Albert Tucker, John Perceval, Fred Williams, Joy Hester, Russell Drysdale, Arthur Boyd, Brett Whiteley, Jeffery Smart, Sidney Nolana and many others. The Lookart virtual gallery provides links back to art gallery sites where some of the pieces displayed will be available for sale along with those advertised through  Lookart.

Figure 2  The Village Lyceum

In the remainder of this paper we will consider the GreyPath Village Lyceum as an innovation, and will proceed to examine the adoption of this innovation by older people using the theory of innovation diffusion.
 

The Diffusion of Innovations

The theory of Innovation Diffusion is based on the notion that adoption of an innovation involves the spontaneous or planned spread of new ideas,and Rogers defines an innovation as: “... an idea, practice, or object that is perceived as new.”  (Rogers 1995)

In diffusion theory the existence of an innovation is seen to cause uncertainty in the minds of potential adopters (Berlyne 1962) and uncertainty implies a lack of predictability and of information. Uncertainty can be considered as the degree to which a number of alternatives are perceived in relation to the occurrence of some event, along with the relative probabilities of each of these alternatives occurring. Diffusion is considered to be an information exchange process amongst members of a communicating social network driven by the need to reduce uncertainty (Rogers 1995). Those involved in considering adoption of the innovation are motivated to seek information to reduce this uncertainty (Rogers 1995).

The new ideas upon which an innovation is based are communicated overtime, through various types of communication channels, among the members of a social system. Thus, there are four main elements of innovation diffusion: characteristic of the innovation itself, the nature of the communication channels, the passage of time, and the social system through which the innovation diffuses (Rogers 1995).
 

Characteristics of the innovation itself

Rogers (1995) argues that the attributes and characteristics of the innovation itself are important in determining the manner of its diffusion and the rate of its adoption. He considers these attributes in five categories:

· Relative advantage - the degree to which an innovation is perceived as better than the idea it supersedes. Relative advantage is often expressed in terms of economic profitability, social prestige, orother similar benefits. Rogers (1995) contends that an innovation’s relativeadvantage is positively correlated with its rate of adoption.

· Compatibility - the degree to which an innovation is perceived by potential adopters as being consistent with their existing values and past experiences. Compatibility with what is already in place makes the new idea seem less uncertain, more familiar, and helps to give it meaning. Rogers (1995) claims that the perceived compatibility of an innovation is positively related to its rate of adoption.

· Complexity - the degree to which an innovation is perceived as difficult to understand and use. Rogers claims that the more complex the innovation, the less likely it is to be quickly adopted.

· Trialability - the degree to which a particular innovation may be subjected to limited experimentation. Rogers’ research suggests that if a potential adopter is able to ‘play’ with the innovation before being faced with an adoption decision, then adoption is more likely.

· Observability. The more the results of an innovation are visible to others, the more likely the innovation is to be adopted.

Attributes of the potential adopter are also seen as an important consideration in the adoption of an innovation. Rogers (1995) maintains that these attributes include social status, level of education, degree of cosmopolitanism and amount of innovativeness.

Nature of the communications channels

Acts of communication are a necessary part of any change process and aninnovation can be seen as a special type of communication concerned withthe transmission of new ideas (Kaplan 1991). To reach a potential adopter the innovation must be diffused through a communications channel. Channelsinvolving mass media are often the most rapid and efficient means of spreading awareness of an innovation, but interpersonal channels are generally moreeffective in persuading someone to accept a new idea. This is especially the case, Rogers posits, when the potential adopter can identify easilywith the change agent. Rogers’ research suggests that the more similar these individuals are, the more effective the communication and the more likely the innovation is to be adopted. An exception occurs where the individuals have an identical technical grasp of the innovation, as in this case nodiffusion can occur because there is no new information to exchange between these people.

Early diffusion research was based on a linear model of communicationwhere the innovation is passed directly from a sender to a receiver. In this case the innovation was either adopted as proposed or else it wasnot adopted at all. In the 1970s, researchers began to study the concept of re-invention of innovations (Rogers 1995). In this sense, re-invention refers to: “... the degree to which an innovation is changed or modified by a user in the process of its adoption and implementation” (Rogers 1995:17). Rogers suggests that, in almost all cases, a considerable degree of re-invention does occur and so rather than a linear model of communication, a convergence model would perhaps be more appropriate.
 

The passage of time

Rogers argues that time is involved in three aspects of innovation diffusion:the innovation-decision process, the degree of innovativeness, and an innovation’srate of adoption. He outlines five main time-dependant steps in the innovation-decision process that the adopter must pass through as: knowledge - finding outabout the innovation, persuasion - forming a favourable or unfavourable attitude towards the innovation, decision - the adoption or rejection choice, implementation - putting the innovation to use, and confirmation - seeking reinforcement to continue, or reversing the decision.

In common with many other earlier researchers Rogers (1995) has foundthat different individuals in a social system do not necessarily adoptan innovation at the same time. Borrowing from the work of Deutschmann and Fals Borda (Deutschmann 1962) he proposes that adopters can be classifiedin their degree of ‘innovativeness’ into five categories as: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority and laggards, and that if the number of individuals adopting a new idea is plotted over time it usually follows a normal, bell-shaped curve.
 

The social system

In the innovation diffusion paradigm, diffusion occurs within a social system in which the social structure constitutes a boundary. It is inside this boundary that the innovation diffuses. Rogers argues that the system’s social structure affects diffusion through the action of social norms,the roles taken by opinion leaders and change agents, the types of innovation decisions that are taken, and the social consequences of the innovation.This paradigm thus accepts concepts from the social construction of technology,and is based on the idea that technology is shaped by social factors.
 

The GreyPath Village as an Innovation

Currently the GreyPath Village receives some 400,000 hits per month which constitute about 5,000 to 6,000 different visitors. Twelve months ago there were approximately 1,200 – 2,000 visitors per month. Lewis suggests that site loyalty is quite good; that is, the percentage of visitors returning to GreyPath is quite high, some 37-38% compared to the industry benchmarkof 20-25%. The GreyPath portal uses site counters with a great deal of sophistication to count the number of visitors and can distinguish between first and return  visitors. “The last one we used from NBCI over aperiod of time lists visitors that were recognized as coming back to the site again. … they do not know whether it is a Web search engine trolling once a month or whether it is an individual.” As the site loyalty factoris high and as the number of visitors to GreyPath is increasing it is reasonable to assume that there is a considerable degree of adoption of the GreyPath innovation. One difficulty with the counters, of course, is that they cannot detect the age of the site visitor, and so we cannot know for certain whether they are older people or not. Further research in the form of interviews and surveys will be required to determine this.

What makes older people return to GreyPath Village? How do they communicate the news of this new innovation to other older people? To answer these questions we will use the diffusion of innovation framework (Rogers 1995), to examine the GreyPath Village Lyceum, a major component of the GreypathWeb portal.

In considering the GreyPath Village Lyceum as an innovation we will begin by looking at its characteristics and how they might compare to the characteristics of alternatives, but before we can do this we must ask the question: what are the alternatives that the Village Lyceum seeks tosupplement and replace? One feature of the Lyceum is its chat room. This communication method competes with meeting physically at clubs orother social or family events, telephone conversations, letter writing and electronic mail. The Lyceum also has the Lookart virtual gallery. An alternative to this exists in actually visiting the various art galleries that exist in most Australian cities. In the sections that follow we will compare the characteristics of the Lyceum chat room and Lookart gallery with these alternatives to explain why older people may be adopting this innovation. In the interests of space, in this paper we will concentrate on Rogers’ main elements of innovation diffusion: characteristics of the innovation itself, and mention the other elements only briefly.
 

Examining the characteristics of the GreyPath Village Lyceum

1. There are several relative advantages of older people accessing the Lyceum when compared with the alternatives. Older people, who are disabled or geographically isolated, can now view art at their leisure from the convenience of their homes or through Internet public access centres such as libraries and seniors computing clubs. The art appreciation course through Lookart is always open at no charge and does not require any travel. Older people can discuss artists currently showcased or any other subject areas that they can find in common. In the past, alternatives for art appreciation were to physically visit an artist’s exhibition at a gallery where they could view the works and find other interested parties to discuss the paintings.The Lyceum provides up to date information about art works for sale via links to galleries, immediately accessible via the Web, thereby making the hunt for art books, art catalogues and TV programs unnecessary. In the chat room of the Lyceum art lovers can minimise potential embarrassment by anonymously discussing works of the current artist being showcased or any other art objects.
2. As mentioned earlier, statistics suggest that older Australian people are increasingly accessing the GreyPath Village site. It appears then, that the Village Lyceum is quite compatible with values and norms of the social system. In fact a recent survey (Lepa 2002) shows that one of the motivational reasons for some older people to undergo Internet training sessions was to be able to access ‘culture and the arts’.information.
3. It might appear that using a Web site would involve a greater degree of complexity than the alternatives, and this is probably the case.The Village was, however, conceived and developed by Ray Lewis with the help of twenty ‘older person’ advisors with one of the objectives being to make it easy and simple to use, so the negative connotations of complexity are probably not too great in this instance.
4. Trialability of the GreyPath Village Lyceum is available through public libraries, computer clubs and family members. “It can of course be trialled free of cost by anyone who is on line, and who may then decide if it suits them or not, and return or depart as they wish, without cost” (Lewis 2002).
5. Observability of the Internet is high, with exposure at public libraries, on TV, at computer clubs (and also through speaking with grandchildren).Once onto the Internet, observability of the GreyPath Village Lyceum is highly likely as it is often spoken of at these locations (Lewis 2002).

Lewis (2002) suggests that the main target audience for GreyPath is Australians and New Zealanders. The GreyPath site has been developed with the intention of attracting older females who are keen to “socialise more as they age.” Older retired males are also targeted, and Lewis classifies those who have just retired as “changing state males” as they have suddenly lost, to a large extent, their main means of socialisation through the workplace and are now looking for more relationships. “They are suddenly discovering outside relationships.”

Nature of the communications channels

There are a number of avenues through which older Australian people are made aware of the GreyPath Village site. Lewis (2002) has created a high public profile and heavily promotes his site by speaking at various forums of influential groups such as an E-Commerce and older person forum hosted by Victoria University (Lewis 2001). He is getting good newspaper coverage(Mitchell 2000) and liaises frequently with important seniors groups such as the Australian Seniors Computer Clubs Association (ASCCA) (Bosler 2001).This is an important vehicle whereby Australian older people can be informed about the existence of the GreyPath portal  and  Village, anda t club meetings can access the site as most clubs have Internet facilities. Other major communication channels suggested by Lewis (2002) are word of mouth and Australian list servers such as NEAT and VEAT (Victorian Education, Ageing and Information Technology). Also there are many Internet sites that now link to GreyPath (Lewis 2002) including COTA (http://www.cota.org.au).

Word of mouth can be a very important medium. For instance, the authors of this paper have relayed information about the GreyPath site to work colleagues who have in turn passed on the information to their older parents. Lewis notes that communication about his site is permeating through tothe Australian older person community with more visitors each month.

The passage of time, and the social system

The innovation diffuses in the wider community, but the social system we are concerned with here as a boundary is the community of older people.Rogers suggests that the system’s social structure affects diffusion through the action of social norms (we have already briefly discussed this) and the roles taken by opinion leaders and change agents. Ray Lewis himself is the major change agent in this instance through his heavy promotion of the GreyPath site. Other influential people that are promoting the GreyPath Village innovation include the editors of the list servers NEAT and VEAT and the President, Nan Bosler, of the Australian Seniors Computer Clubs Association (ASCCA).
 

Conclusion

In this paper we have used diffusion theory to outline a research approach to exploring the adoption of the GreyPath Village Lyceum by older people.The innovation that we have considered is a virtual community of older people using the Internet in a particular way to access a specific site.One problem we did have, however, was deciding what the innovation actually was. Was it older people using the Internet itself, was it older people using the GreyPath site with all its informational categories and entertainment links, or was it, much more specifically, older people using the GreyPath Village Lyceum? We decided on the latter, but all of these other things could also be considered as innovations.

Another research problem encountered was what can we say about people accessing the Village Lyceum in particular rather than other elements ofthe GreyPath portal site? Some people may visit the portal to get some news and information and not access the Village. The statistics show only access to the overall site and not to its component parts. Further research is required to ascertain the number of people who go on to access the Village Lyceum, and how many of these are indeed older people. Further research will also be needed to identify the people using the site to see if they are indeed older people. This will probably be done in the form of interviews and surveys. It will also be interesting to find out if those using the site have any similarities in their backgrounds, such as level of education or previous employment.
 

References

Barnatt, C. (1998). “Virtual communities and financial services - on-line business potentials   and strategic choice.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 16(4).

Berlyne, D. E. (1962). “Uncertainty and Epistemic Curiosity.” British Journal of Psychology 53: 27-34.

Bishop, B. M. (2000). Attitude, Lifestyle and Community Support Discussion Paper. Canberra, Australian Government Printing Service.

Bosler, N. (2001). "Communication, e-commerce and older people". Electronic Banking and Older People Seminar, Victoria University, Melbourne.

Coulson, I. (2000). “Introduction: Technological Challenges for Gerontologists in the 21st Century.”  Educational Gerontology 26(4): 307-316.

Deutschmann, P. J. & Fals Borda, O. (1962). "Communication and Adoption Patterns in an Andean village. San Jose, Costa Rica, Programa Interamericano de Informacion Popular.

Fozard, J. L., Rietsma, J., Bouma, H., Graafmans, J.A.M. (2000). “Gerontechnology: Creating Enabling Environments for the Challenges and Opportunities of Aging.” Educational Gerontology 26: 331-344.

Franklin, M. B. (1997). Caught Up in the 'Net'; More and More Seniors are Discovering the     Usefulness of Computers. The Washington Post. Washington: Z17.

Hagel, J., Armstrong, A. (1997). "Net Gain: Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities", Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

Jones, S. (1995), "Understanding community in the information age", Jones, S.G., Cybersociety: Computer-mediated Communication and Community, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage :10-35.

Kaplan, B., Ed. (1991). "Models of Change and Information Systems Research." Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers: 593-611.

Kozinets, R., 1998, "On netnography. Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture", Alba, J., Hutchinson, W., Advances in Consumer Research,  Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, 25  :366-71.

Lepa, J. (2002). "Internet Information Services for Older Australian People." Proceedings of the Pan-Pacific Conference XIX e-Globalization and the Pacific Age, Bangkok, Thailand.

Lewis, R. (2001). "Seniors and information technology". E-commerce, Electronic Banking and Older People Seminar, Victoria University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria University of Technology.

Lewis, R. (2002). "Greypath Portal Interview", Interview data , March.

Lynch, J. (1998). "Web Portals."  PC Magazine, Nov 13.

Matathia, I. S., M. (1998). NEXT    Trends for the Future. Australia, McMillan.

Mitchell, S. (2000). Catching the silver wave. The Australian: 53, 29th Aug.

Muniz, A.M., 1997, "Brand community and the negotiation of brand meaning", Brucks, M., MacInnis, D.J., Advances in Consumer Research, 24, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT 24:308-9.

Parekh, J. P. (1998). “Distance Learning for Enhancing Senior Productivity.” IEEE Computer 1: 4805-4808.

Rao, S. S. (2001). “Portal proliferation: an Indian scenario.” New Library World 102(9): 325-331.

Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York.

Schneider, G. P., Perry, J.T. (2000). Electronic Commerce. South Melbourne, Australia, Thomson Learning.

Scott, H. (1999). “Seniors in Cyberspace Older people and Information.” Strategic Ageing Australian Issues in Ageing 8(99).

Tatnall, A. and Lepa, J. (2001). Researching the Adoption of E-Commerce and the Internet by Older People. We-B Conference, Perth
.

Copyright

Jerzy Lepa, Arthur Tatnall  © 2002. The authors assign to Southern Cross University and other educational and non-profit institutions a non-exclusive licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to Southern Cross University to publish this document in full on the World Wide Web and on CD-ROM and in printed form with the conference papers and for the document to be published on mirrors on the World Wide Web.