Integrating WWW into an on-campus laboratory-based teaching program
Lisa Wise, Department of Psychology, Monash University,
Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. Phone +61 3 9905 3978 Fax: +61 3 9905 3948
Email: lisa.wise@sci.monash.edu.au
Home Page: Lisa Wise [HREF 1]
Chris Hughes, Department of Psychology, Monash University,
Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. Phone +61 3 9905 3978 Fax: +61 3 9905 3948
Email: chris.hughes@sci.monash.edu.au
Keywords: WorldWideWeb, On-Campus, Computer-Assisted Learning, Tertiary Education, Psychology
Introduction
Structure of Second Year Psychology Program
In recent years, we have introduced a significant computer-based component into
our second-year laboratory-based program in psychology at Monash University's
Clayton campus. The program comprises two sequential semester units of
thirteen weeks duration during which students attend four one-hour lectures
and a four-hour laboratory class per week. The four lecture streams
comprise two core units of study, one optional topic and a stream of
statistics. The laboratory program complements the lecture topics, but is
structured as a stand-alone program taught to three separate groups of
students. The laboratory component of the course is labour-intensive to teach,
and the use of the World Wide Web (WWW) described in this paper is
centred on material presented as part of this laboratory program. Examples
used in this paper will be taken from the first semester program, PSY2011.
Hypertext links to this dynamic teaching site are unlikely to be valid beyond
the end of 1996.
Previous use of computer software within our course
Computer-related activities have been designed as far as possible to make use of
existing generalist software products, rather than specialist psychology software.
This strategy is partly pragmatic (generalist products are readily available at
no additional cost to our department), but is also driven by an educational
principle that the skills we teach in the context of psychology should as
far as possible be transferable skills. The types of "generic" and custom-written
products incorporated into our laboratory program are listed below in Table 1.
| Table 1. Computer products used in our Psychology Laboratory Program |
| Generic Products |
Psychology-specific Custom Products |
- word-processing (Microsoft Word for Windows)
- data analysis
- spreadsheets (e.g. Microsoft Excel)
- statistical packages (e.g. SPSS for Windows, Systat)
- email (Pegasus Mail)
- newsgroups (e.g. Trumpet Newsreader, Netscape)
- lecture materials (e.g. Microsoft Powerpoint, Microsoft Word for Windows)
|
- custom-written software to run psychological experiments
- electronic tutorial and testing programs
- a custom-written Statistics tutoring package
|
Most of our computer-related activities have been restricted to PC-based programs
using a DOS / Windows standard student computing environment delivered from
the University's centrally-managed Novell fileservers. Limited customisation for
psychology students has focussed on providing menu systems and Visual Basic
custom interfaces to guide students through specific tasks using standard
software packages.
Trial use of Web materials in 1995
In 1995, we made our course notes available on the World Wide
Web in addition to printing traditional hard-copy booklets and providing
printed handouts for laboratory class exercises. The rationale was that
the Web version of course material could be easily updated, and would have a
"value-added" component of hypermedia links to Internet resources relevant
to each course topic.
The possibility for timed release of background materials, instructions,
and follow-up information was a major advantage of the Web as a content delivery
medium compared with the traditional static hard-copy medium.
In running our lab classes, there are often aspects of an experiment that are
not revealed to students until after they have attempted to solve or generate
something on their own or they have collected certain prescribed data.
In some circumstances, the students themselves are acting as "naive subjects"
in an experiment which they will later write up from the perspective of
the experimenter. The data they analyse for these
write-ups are the data they themselves generated or collected,
and such data obviously can only be made available after the event. In most
experiments, although the nature of the data can to some extent be predicted
ahead of time, there are often idiosyncracies associated with running the
experiment that particular time that may need detailed discussion or
additional background material.
A further advantage of Web-based materials in a collaborative teaching
environment such as ours (with parallel lab classes complementing a number
of independently-taught lecture streams), is that course materials are open
to scrutiny by colleagues. Conceptual and/or hypermedia links to other areas
of a student's course both within and beyond psychology can be made readily
by other staff browsing the course content. In the modern teaching environment,
we are rarely directly exposed to the teaching practices of other staff, and so
many opportunities for linking of content across units are missed.
This collaborative teaching model could prove to be especially useful in
cross-disciplinary areas of psychology, such as cognitive neuroscience, which spans
psychology, physiology, philosophy, computer science and linguistics).
Issues arising from our initial Web trial
Difficulty of maintaining source documents
Our original concept was that a single source document would serve as the
source for both our standard hard-copy booklets and HTML documents. HTML
documents could be generated relatively automatically (e.g. using Internet
Assistant or similar software) and then placed on the Web.
However Web documents generated from documents designed for printing
do not always use the hypermedia environment effectively because they are
inherently linearly structured. There is evidence to suggest that the
least successful form of computer-aided learning is that which merely
involves transcribing pages of printed text to electronic form (Welsh, 1993).
However any structural change to the source document to tailor it
for the hyperlinked Web environment entails that the HTML version(s)
take on an independent life separate from the original source.
This raises the serious problem of multiple source documents which need
to be maintained.
Low student usage of Web during trial
The obvious educational advantage of Web-based courseware appeared to be its
immediate availability to students in the latest form. Web-based material
can be regularly updated and information can be presented in a manner that
is responsive to student feedback and to the individual needs of any
particular student group. Any errors or omissions can be remedied immediately
and without costly reprinting of material, and additional material can be
inserted in relevant places by hyperlinks when and where required.
However, our students for the most part did not consider themselves to be
computer-literate, and appeared to feel under enormous time pressure
in their studies. So although they were happy knowing that there were up-to-date
materials available to them, students rarely used them because it was easier to
refer to an out-of-date hard-copy version in their hands. It did not appear to
occur to them that accessing more up-to-date information would often have saved
them time by clarifying difficult concepts and / or correcting errors and
misconceptions.
Planned use of Web materials in 1996
As a result of the trial of the Web as a medium for delivering course material
in 1995, we learnt two important lessons:
- that authoring for the Web is inherently a different process than authoring for
the print media
- that providing a hard copy of Web-based materials will result in students
using the hard copy rather than the Web, even when they "intend" to do otherwise.
As a result, we opted to construct our laboratory program material for 1996
specifically for the Web (assuming that students would access the Web
using Netscape 1.2, the Web browser currently provided by Monash University
for its standard staff and student computing environment).
Details of overall course structure and lecture details
were printed in a course booklet given to each student in the first
lecture as usual, and this material was duplicated on the Web as happened in 1995.
However, only the laboratory class timetable was included in this printed manual,
along with a URL for the course home page which linked to the
full laboratory
program on the Web [HREF 2].
This paper examines the design of our course web site along with the
perceived benefits and potential pitfalls of this approach. It should be kept
in mind that at no stage have we conceptualised our Web material as
replacing face-to-face teaching. Rather use of the Web allows us to use
face-to-face (class contact) time more effectively. In addition, use of newsgroups
(a key feature of our use of the "internet", although not strictly part of the WWW)
allows for asynchronous "face-to-face discussion" which serves to
enhance our real face-to-face discussion.
Design of our Web Site
Navigational concerns
The Home Page for our
Web site [HREF 3] is a welcoming page describing the generic layout
of Web pages and providing links to
Internet tutorials [HREF 4] provided by Monash University library staff.
It then describes the specific resources available through the page to
students in the course (PSY2011).
Once students become familiar with the contents of this page, they want to navigate
to relevant material quickly. To facilitate navigation, we have a Quick Index at
the top of the page (a design suggested by
N.Bailey of Monash University's Computer Centre [HREF 5]).
This Quick Index has links to the things that students most commonly need to access for
their course work and has improved user-friendliness of the Web site considerably.
In order to reduce the possibility of the "lost in hyperspace" phenomenom
(Neilson, 1990), we
wanted to set our Home button to be our course's Home Page. However, due
to constraints of our student computer network, we had to settle for a Home button
setting that returned to a
menu of Psychology undergraduate
resources [HREF 6]. It should be noted that this transparent customisation of
the Home button can cause difficulties for computer novices who are using
the same Web browser for subjects other than psychology. The difficulties arise
because the Home button works differently depending on the subject context in
which they are working. "Mysterious things", such as standard buttons behaving
differently for reasons beyond a student's control or understanding, can lead to
feelings of incompetence in using computers. We therefore spend time emphasising
navigation proficiency in Netscape (using the Forward / Back
buttons, the View History option, bookmarks and the Home button), and we try to
explain the concept of hyperlinks so that students come to understand what is
actually happening when they "click on the blue bits". The value of customisation
is that students can complete set tasks without extra help, and the positive
reinforcement from using the computer successfully encourages them to try to
understand the underlying concepts.
Design of content
We have tried to structure our pages such that the basic information for
each laboratory class is readily available through obvious structured links
within "conceptual neighbourhoods" (Eklund, Garrett, Ryan and Harvey, 1995).
We have also provided
further annotated links to other materials which provide background or
related information. We have opted for separate documents where the background
material is not absolutely required, or is assumed pre-knowledge so that
we end up with as brief a linear document as possible, but with built-in
cross-referencing and extra tutorial-style detail where appropriate. In some
instances, we make use of tutorial material generated elsewhere - for instance,
in our lab class on
Behaviour and Heredity
[HREF 7], we direct students to tutorial
material on basic genetics from M.I.T and from the University of Texas.
Further cross-referencing and tutorial material (e.g. weekly lab summaries)
are added at short notice when required. In order to emphasise new
material, new links are added at the top of each lab topic page
e.g.
Computer attitudes topic [HREF 8] with a sequence of added information.
Our prime consideration is to provide a minimalist framework for the traditional
directed-learning "didactic" environment with which students are familiar, but
at the same time to build in support for student-centred learning in both a
topic-focussed (directed) and interest-focussed (non-directed) way. Our
use of newsgroups (discussed in greater detail below) also has this dual aim
of minimalist support for anyone to "ask the teacher questions" at any time,
but provides additional support for students and staff to supply information, raise
their own queries or issues and share their own perspectives on a topic.
Graphic design
We opted for a basic design using only standard HTML as far as possible (although
we have used centred headings and tables). In our 1995 Web trial, we attempted to
pretty our pages with small graphics, however our 1996 pages have graphics only
where required as part of the course content. For example, we have a table pointing
to sample GIF files which are facsimiles of the experimental stimuli used for a
Language Acquisition
experiment [HREF 9]. We also have experiments such as the
McCollough
Effect [HREF 10] for which the visual stimuli are actually presented via
the Web. We have specifically avoided background images, image
maps as navigational tools, and custom-designed "pretty pages" as being distracting
rather than professional. We assume that well-organised links and
content will motivate our students to explore the learning environment rather
than game-like or advertising-style features of our presentation.
This strategy works well because most of our material is text-based and we have
made "visual material" such as data files available to students
via the student Novell network rather than the Web since the analysis software
such as SPSS for Windows and Microsoft Excel are available through that medium only.
Interactive Forms (CGI scripts) for data entry
In addition to basic content, we used Perl CGI-scripts to generate interactive forms
for collecting data for some experiments. For example, the Computer Attitudes
laboratory topic included a standard survey for scoring computer
attitudes, the
Computer Attitudes Survey [HREF 11] (Loyd and Gressard, 1984). Our psychology students
also generated
their own new survey [HREF 12] after consideration of issues surrounding
survey construction and factors influencing use of computers. The second survey is an
example of a CGI script that could not be generated in advance of the class, and
emphasises the need for technical support to be readily available at short notice,
or for teaching staff themselves to have sufficient technical capability.
The CGI scripts generated forms, checked that data entered by
students conformed to what was expected, and then emailed the data to a
course account, from which information was extracted and processed. The
email allowed us to track time and date of completion of work, and we
also emailed a copy of each data set to the individual student as
confirmation of their data submission. The CGI scripts did some basic
checking of email addresses against class lists, but there was no
serious attempt to authenticate users.
Newsgroups
Some psychology laboratory classes were designed around active
discussion of critical issues of psychology material, for example each
of the following topics resulted in focussed discussion via the
newsgroups:
The Netscape browser used by our students incorporates a newsreader and
interprets hypertext links within news articles. We were able to place
links in our Web pages to the relevant newsgroups, and we were also able
to place links to our Web pages in news articles. This latter feature
proved to be a very useful "noticeboard". New information added to the
Web site could be readily accessed from a news post announcing its
placement. Students with queries, and students encountering difficulties
finding information could be pointed to the appropriate URLs via
newsgroups.
Monash newsgroups are not currently carried by newsservers outside of
Monash University so that discussion within the newsgroups can not be
demonstrated "live". However, discussion was very lively with over 600
posts to the monash.psych.psy2011.labs newsgroup during the semester.
The use of the newsgroups was useful to students because it was
regularly monitored by staff, and it proved to be a very fruitful way of
gaining information. In our experience, course newsgroups without appropriate
nurturing by teaching staff carry very little traffic and contribute
little educationally to a course. By contrast, our newsgroups provided a
intellectual and social focus so that for a number of our students,
psychology content became part of their daily routine in a way they had never
envisaged.
Computer Laboratory Manual as a source of computer help
Our students come from a non-technical background, and it was our
responsibility to provide sufficient support for them so that use
of computers would not distract them unduly from the psychology
content (the primary reason they took the course and our primary
teaching responsibility). To this end, we provided a Web-based
computer manual tailor-made for students of psychology operating
within the Monash University student computer environment.
The
Computer Laboratory Manual [HREF 15] was designed for ease of navigation,
making extensive use of Quick Index menus. It did not attempt to replicate
or replace manuals for individual software packages but rather, attempted
to supply basic information, from which students could "bootstrap" their learning.
Limitations / Concerns re Web courseware
Hypertext Mark-up Language as an authoring tool
It has been suggested by Pennell and Deane (1995) that HTML has benefits
over other authoring tools such that
- it is modifiable by any wordprocessing package
- it is a language with few elements to learn
- updating and maintenance are easy
- references can be live links to material on the Internet
- Web search engines can be linked into courseware
- courseware delivery does not rely on tractibility of computer programmers
- many features of traditional academic genres can be retained
However our initial experience with HTML suggested that some of these superficial
attractions of HTML require further analysis. There is certainly a learning curve
associated with generating HTML documents and until recently, HTML editors for
non-computer-programmers were not readily accessible. Although there are few HTML
elements to learn, any sophisticated hypermedia environment needs to go beyond basic
HTML for its implementation (e.g. HTML extensions, imagemapping, CGI scripts). Updating
and maintaining a dynamic hyperlinked environment is not a trivial task when there
are multiple links maintained by a variety of people many of whom are not even known
to the courseware designer. Secretaries and / or clerical assistants would require
extensive training to handle a multiply-linked Web environment and generally do not
have the combination of typing, computer and graphics skills required to maintain
a high quality Web site. Neither clerical nor computer support personnel have the
requisite content-expertise to update a dynamic teaching environment, and in order
to make use of the flexibility, responsiveness and currency of the Web as a teaching
and learning environment, teaching staff themselves need to become technically competent
to maintain their Web site, adding a significant preparation component to their
teaching task.
Web as a platform
Reliability and access
The use of Web materials requires reliable access to the Web server.
There need to be sufficient terminals and fast enough connection speed
so that students do not lose interest before the pages they
have selected are loaded. Access and reliability are always a problem with
computing equipment, but it is likely that within the forseeable future
many households will have their own private connections to the Internet
through Internet Service Providers, making Web-based course delivery
more attractive to both students and staff. In our particular situation,
we chose to use a Web platform to overcome immediate practical problems of
access and reliability of the Monash student PC network which, at the time of
designing the course, could only be accessed by using an on-campus
university computer terminal connected to the Novell network.
One of the most important features of our use of the internet is the
ability to link to course-related newsgroups, some of which carry discussion
that is part of the student's formal assessment. Since Monash newsgroups are not
carried on newsservers outside of Monash, students at this point in time cannot
access this part of their course via commercial internet service
providers. It should be noted that technology changes quickly, and
service providers tend to respond to changing circumstances so
current constraints may not be relevant in a few months or years.
Educational Issues
Quality of material on the Web
There are concerns that using the Web in teaching will ultimately be distracting
because of the wealth of irrelevant, undesirable, or poor quality material
that exists. Furthermore, as a means of containing potential the cost of internet
traffic, it has been suggested that coursework should be restriced to
preselected sites determined by the instructor. Such a conceptualisation of
the Web would not conform to the educational objectives of our teaching
program which emphasises independent student-directed, student-controlled
research with the responsibility for content-selection and validation placed squarely
with the individual student using the information. In using the relatively "new"
internet as a standard part of the research environment for our students,
we are in a position to emphasise certain aspects of research that are also
relevant to the traditional information environment of the print media:
- reliability of the source of information
- authenticity of the information
- validity (theoretical and practical) of the material
- currency of the information
We ask that students make informed critiques of the material they find and
especially that they check the sources of information. If no sources are
given, we ask them to question whether the information can be considered
reliable in any scientific sense of the word.
We also suggest that students record the source of information in a manner
analogous to good library referencing. Netscape along with other Web browsers
has the facility to store bookmarks, and in more recent versions of Netscape,
these bookmark files can be annotated.
Directed learning versus free access to materials
A concern with placing material on the Web is the other side
of the "availability" coin. Our course presents some information in a
planned order and while the Web allows students to work through
material at their own pace, there are certain points within each lab where
we require students to "catch up to each other". It can be tempting
for students to read ahead without having completed earlier segments
of the course, and it is certainly educationally undesirable
to allow students to "read the end of the story" before they have
looked at the middle.
There are also the obvious copyright-related problems of making course
materials available on the Web. However as our materials are an integral
part of an intensive on-campus teaching program involving significant
face-to-face teaching, we feel that the essence of our program is safe
from plagiarism.
Student Feedback on Web courseware
We will conduct formal evaluation of our use of Web within our course, focussing
on the requirement this year of retrieving information from the Web compared
with the optional use last year. Informal feedback so far suggests that students
are very happy with the availability of material through this medium, and in
particular, enjoy the discussion available through the newsgroups.
We are hoping that the fact that students have to start the Web browser regularly
will place the internet within their conceptualisation of "work" rather than
"novelty play item" and will lead them to consider other aspects of the internet
and computers in general more favourably. The realisation that Web searches,
Library searches, Document-delivery services and CD-ROM database searches can
all be performed from the one workstation while browsing the course notes may
allow students to develop a solid level of computer literacy without even
realising it, leading to greater self-esteem and sense of self-efficacy.
Future Directions
We are considering in future years whether all our material should be Web based,
including downloadable custom-written experimental programs and downloadable
lecture material that is currently available only on the student Novell fileservers.
There are rapid advances in software for Web development (Java, advanced /
enhanced Web browsers, Internet Assistant for Powerpoint, etc) so possibilities
appear endless. There are also advances in communications technology such that
internet access from home is far more viable for all students.
However it should be emphasised that a major objective in designing our
Web site is that it works reliably for the majority of students
and is readily maintainable by the teaching staff of the course without
the need for a fleet of computer consultants. To this end, we have actively
chosen to stay away from "bleeding edge technology for tomorrow".
We have very deliberately resisted anything too technically ambitious
but rather have employed a range of fairly simple technologies in an
effective combination to achieve our educational aims.
Conclusion
The Web can be used productively and successfully to enhance an on-
campus teaching program to the benefit of both staff and students. The
use of technology in this way enriches the educational experience, but
does not reduce the resources required for teaching. Rather, it spreads
the load differently.
However we should not lose sight of the fact that the
primary focus of our particular educational program is to teach the
discipline of psychology. Computer-aided enhancements to our
course must in the first instance enhance our ability to teach psychology and
secondary benefits of computer literacy for our students and "workplace
skills" should not become the de facto driving force for restructuring teaching
programs to the detriment of discipline-area content.
References
J Ekland, P Garrett, S Ryan and J Harvey (1995) "Designing the World Wide Web
as an Educational Delivery Medium at the University of Sydney", ASCILITE Conference
Proceedings, 12th Annual Conference of the
Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, pp. 132-137.
BH Loyd and C Gressard (1984) "Reliability and factorial validity of computer
attitude scales", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol 44 pp. 501-505.
J Nielsen (1990) "Hypertext and Hypermedia" Academic Press, London.
R Pennell and EM Deane (1995) "Web Browser Support for Problem-based
Learning" in "ASCILITE Conference Proceedings", 12th Annual Conference of the
Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, pp. 441-447.
JA Welsh (1993) "The Effectiveness of Computerised Instruction at the College
Level: Five Suggestions for Successful Implementation", Behaviour Research Methods,
Instruments & Computers, Vol 25, pp. 220-222.
Hypertext References
- HREF 1
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/staff/lzwise/index.htm
- Dr Lisa Wise's Home Page.
- HREF 2
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/labprog.htm
- Outline and timetable for PSY2011 Laboratory Program with links to lab material.
- HREF 3
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/index.htm
- PSY2011 Course Home Page.
- HREF 4
- http://www.monash.edu.au/library/training/
- Monash University Library's Internet training courses.
- HREF 5
- http://www.monash.edu.au/~nate/
- Mr Nathan Bailey's Home Page.
- HREF 6
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/menu.html
- A list of Monash Psychology Department's Internet Undergraduate Resources.
- HREF 7
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/b-h.htm
- Laboratory material for Behaviour and Heredity Lab Class.
- HREF 8
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/compatt.htm
- Laboratory material for Attitudes to Computers Lab Class.
- HREF 9
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/wug.htm
- Laboratory material for Language Acquisition Lab Class.
- HREF 10
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/mccoll.htm
- Laboratory material for McCollough Effect Lab Class.
- HREF 11
- http://www-cgi.monash.edu.au/cgi-bin/cgiwrap?user=lzwise&script=compatt.pl
- Computer Attitude Scale CGI script for data entry.
- HREF 12
- http://www-cgi.monash.edu.au/cgi-bin/cgiwrap?user=lzwise&script=ca2011.pl
- PSY2011 version of a Computer Attitude Scale, CGI script for data entry.
- HREF 13
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/ethics.htm
- Laboratory material for Ethics Lab Class.
- HREF 14
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/drugs.htm
- Laboratory material for Drugs and Behaviour Lab Class.
- HREF 13
- http://www.monash.edu.au/psych/psy2011/comp_96/
- Computer Laboratory Manual written specifically for Psychology undergraduate students.
Copyright
Lisa Wise, Chris Hughes © 1996. The authors assigns to Southern Cross University
and other educational and non-profit institutions a non-exclusive licence to use
this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article
is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also
grant a non-exclusive licence to Southern Cross University to publish this document
in full on the World Wide Web and on CD-ROM and in printed form with the conference
papers, and for the document to be published on mirrors on the World Wide Web.
Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the author.
AusWeb96 The Second Australian WorldWideWeb Conference
ausweb96@scu.edu.au