| Project aspect | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Com'nality |
| Virtual teams more fun than face to face teams | 0.81 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.79 |
| Would do it again | 0.74 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.79 |
| Virtual teams more fun than anticipated | 0.70 | 0.47 | 0.09 | 0.45 |
| Virtual teams more efficient than face to face teams | 0.67 | 0.34 | -0.08 | 0.63 |
| Virtual teams more efficient than anticipated | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.01 | 0.44 |
| Time pressure increases the likelihood of success in a
virtual
environment |
0.46 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.57 |
| Would prefer to work alone rather than in virtual teams | -0.63 | -0.14 | -0.24 | 0.76 |
| Would prefer local teams to virtual teams for the same or similar task | -0.77 | -0.06 | 0.22 | 0.73 |
| All team members did their best | 0.21 | 0.85 | 0.17 | 0.72 |
| Our team worked well | 0.35 | 0.80 | 0.15 | 0.30 |
| Went better than expected | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.10 | 0.41 |
| Defining member roles was easy | -0.09 | 0.65 | -0.11 | 0.56 |
| Local partners more helpful than virtual ones | -0.34 | -0.57 | 0.12 | 0.48 |
| Local team members did more work than virtual partners | -0.37 | -0.70 | -0.09 | 0.76 |
| Cultural similarity a key ingredient for success in virtual environments | -0.15 | -0.08 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| Paticipant's personality a key factor for success in virtual environments | 0.13 | -0.07 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
| Familiarity with Internet technologies a key success factor | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.47 |